Ten Good Reasons to Eliminate Funding for the National Endowment for the Arts
The Heritage Foundation,
01 January 1997, USA
As the U.S. Congress struggles to balance the federal budget and end the decades-long spiral of deficit spending, few programs seem more worthy of outright elimination than the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). Indeed, since its inception in 1965, few federal agencies have been mired in more controversy than the NEA. Nevertheless, steadfast partisans of "welfare for artists" continue to defend the Endowment, asserting that it promotes philanthropic giving, makes cultural programs accessible to those who can least afford them, and protects America's cultural heritage.
USA
ARTSLab encourages collaboration between creative arts and science research
Momentum Gains with Small-Scale Studies about the Arts and Mental Health
See all news from USA